Fox News

The Wikipedia article about Fox News has been heavily vandalized.

Disputed Discovery of North America
Cambro38 edited the article on 12:44pm and 12:46pm, 2017-10-11, to replace the transclusion of the Other uses template to Steve doocey discovered north america, which was reverted shortly thereafter.

The Mad Blanker
On 20:18, 12 November 2017, newly-created account Ben Shapiro 2.0 deleted the majority of the third paragraph:
 * Fox News Channel has been accused of biased reporting, and promoting the Republican Party and conservative causes. Research shows that Fox News increases Republican vote shares among viewers.  Critics have cited the channel as detrimental to the integrity of news overall.  Fox News employees have responded that news reporting operates independently of its opinion and commentary programming, and have denied bias in news reporting.

...with the summary of The edits I made were for information that did not have any meaningful purpose and the information in general, in my conclusion, was to mislead people.. Ammarpad undid the edit on 8:21 pm, but exactly ten minutes later, the new Shapiro undid the edit and, at the same edit, blanked all but one paragraph of the Controversies section, with the remaining paragraph belonging to the Sexual harassment subsection. ...Then ClueBot NG undid the edit at the same minute.

Biased reporting
On 3:16pm,, an anonymous user edited the third paragraph of the article:

Knock It Off
When Snooganssnoogans reverted the above edit on 6:12pm, the user edited the first two words in the mentioned paragraph, which is Fox News, with ''Snooganssnoogans if you don't stop changing my edits I'm gonna find you bust you up. KNOCK IT OFF''. The user persisted when ClueBot NG undid the edit by replacing Fox with Snooganssnoogans if you don't stop changing my edits I'm gonna find you and bust you up., which left the word News intact, this time. One minute later, Shellwood reverts the edit with the summary Personal attack or uncivil behavior t.... The editor continues, by adding a new sentence at the start of the third paragraph. It read, Shellwood if you don't stop changing my edits I'm gonna find you and bust you up..

On 6:16pm, Shell undid the edit, so the editor re-edited on 6:18pm with ''Shellwood are you a retard? Now I will continue to keep my edits over and over again and so on.'' added the same way as mentioned before. The rollbacker undid the user again on 6:19pm, but this time, on 1:07pm the next day, somebody else strengthened the article's protection.